Skip to main content

Landmark, peer-reviewed analysis adds clinical relevance for your everyday practice

  1. Results reported by sites healthy and plaque-free—as opposed to whole-mouth plaque/gingivitis reduction data—allow you to easily set targets for your practice
  2. This analysis reviewed data on the additive benefits of LISTERINE® from randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled studies, including both published and unpublished data
  3. Evidence was drawn from a larger-than-usual population of N>5000 subjects; single studies have an average of 163 subjects

The most robust collection of clinical data of its kind 

3.1.1.-image-1.infographic.png

  • 1 landmark analysis: enabled broader, more clinically relevant conclusions

Analysis compared the results of 2 treatment groups

Control group

  • Mechanical methods (MM) alone
  • 2562 patients

Experimental group

  • MM + LISTERINE®
  • 2544 patients

Sitewise analysis evaluated efficacy at multiple sites per tooth across the entire mouth

Plaque index (PI): 6 sites per tooth

  • Plaque-free sites were defined as those with small pieces of plaque (1) or no plaque (0), based on the PI score

Modified gingival index (MGI): 4 sites per tooth

  • Healthy sites were defined as those with mild (1) to no (0) inflammation, based on the MGI scores

LISTERINE® users were more likely to have a cleaner, healthier mouth vs. MM alone

3.1.1-image-2.png

LISTERINE® users had more plaque-free sites and more healthy sites—even in the hardest-to-reach areas of the mouth

3.1.1-image-3.png

3.1.1-image-4.png

Reference: 1. Araujo MWB, Charles CA, Weinstein RB, et al. Meta-analysis of the effect of an essential oil–containing mouthrinse on gingivitis and plaque. J Am Dent Assoc. 2015;146(8):610-622 and/or post hoc analyses of data.